Cui.omers of her late hufband, and returns thanks for the many fa< ors conferr'd on him ; at the lame time humbly folicits a continuance of their future Commands in behalf of herfeif ; as ihe in- tends to procure the befl aifiitance for enabling h r ro carry on the faid bulinefs

Appointed by bis Majefty in Council for 170/7. Chefhire,— John Leche, of Stretton, Efa. Derby/hire,— Charles Hurt, of Wirkfworth, Eiu. Leicejlerfhtre,—S. Bracebridge Abney, of Lind- ley, Efq. Lincoln/hire,— John Ciacroft, of Hackthorne. ?? Ncrthampt3nj7.irei—Sit W. Langham, of C

of December laft, (together with other malefac- tors) to the terror ofthe people and againft the peace of the King.—Alfo William Bath, Wm. Heap, and Samuel Sutton, charged with vio- lently ?? Elizabeth Needham in the liberty of Swadlincote on the 12th of January laft. The Rev. M

I£ « Ueetiag -. tie ?? : f r J r .e T-nd j r.xifed ieiti.s C-:.n:jflr in. it d fence, ! 1 /•■.-_ 7» at rleCouniyllexll.nh' ?? _ Fr.Jay '■ j .1. cr 7 t -e7, \ j ?? ne- M Uiatking jhall be im- -iui.eU fro- j j ■'-■.deafer thefexerul Tn-.ps ef ?? D,. /..cere j j>' ?? -ttctr Cavalry

LONDON,— f Monday, J fan. 12. !We yefterday received Pari*. Papers to the Sth j inft. The Debates which took place on tne sth ! iuft.in the Tribunate, on the Meli'agc, and on the Plan of the Decree tranfmitted by the Confulate, for determining the relative connexion ot the differ

I i tt ?? £ * J Empire, tbe Ktxalcs fW. a ?? lar cUfs, orl s inati:g from the peafintry, asd live exempt f :o m tascs, on the prc.uce of t.*ieir £e?ds and psflaics, or by the !at>o«r of their hands. ii»ey Mfcftct fo.nilb recrcft., nor are givrn away asferfsj bnt tbey all ferve a

WSQXD, (Tuefday,) fan. 14. I THF. del ti,er, cnnfirtir:.; of fifteen ?? of the | hue, c Lid to hay: at length put to^e», anJ t its dellinuioms repotted to bit ?? Mediier- | r.mean. if our c .em.es, aiier 'lie experience ' whuh they have Lad, fhould have vtr.tu.ed upon fucli ! 1

The ASSIZE of BREAD for the BOROUCH of DERBY To continue fevendays from the date hereof. D«._y, Feb. 26. m - ltt Wbtattn. HouJbtU TheP.ll"; c ?? ?? dr - **•«••*• lb.o7i.dr. ?? J T\ ° 5 7|o 7 10 -|o to. Xp-nn.y Loaf, oio 14 ol< 41 44 3 f«~y Loaf. o o oI 1 6,J „J . 6-F-nny Loaf, O

IHE KING V. HAMMOND AND Will "pHIS was an indidment againft J. Hammond ?nd J.Webb, two journeymen Iboemakers, charging them with aconfpiracy to advance their wages. Mr. Mingay ftated the cafe Ihe objed of the cmf; iracy was to compel the mailers to advance the *ages o( the journ

Before Lo;d KrsvoN 2nd a Sped.l Jury. The Kr- Z ?? Cv.ktll. -pHIS was an ind'.eto.rnt agiinft the defendant, an ermnetv t onkte'lerin mtuni--iow. for puel.f_.nz. the j». e -. Glhc-t W.kefi-i_', Reply to the AdJref, of ?? Landaff. The Attorney Gm-ral liacd the cafe to the jury. H