The learned Commissioner remarked, it would not be at all an unreasonable rule that a party appearing to oppose the sureties should be deemed to have given notice to oppose at the hearing. That’s the. secret of the mistake in this case, I suppose. Friday, Dec. 8, (Before Mr. Com

Bryant».'Beeson, Wl Buchanan v. Ashton, Dennis, 36 v. Roberts, 156 Buckle, re George, 26 Bnrdall v. Pearson, 185 Burgess v. Newington, 37 Bnrleigh v. Wood, 157 Burnman v. Cannt,‘27l Burroughs v. Bouquet, 270 Burton v. Okill, 270 CAERUTHERS v. CALEDONIAN WAY, 155 . , ex parte, re

JACQUET, ex parte, 29 Jackman v. Crosby, 174 James v. Carter, 269 Jay, re, 153 Jenkins v. Hutchinson, 226 Joel, Leyin, 287 Johns v. Bedford, 31 Johnson o. Ward, 149 -■ v. The Midland Bailway Company, 200 •Johnstone, re William, 52 Jones v. Davies, 39 l>. Ellis, 325 v. Nathan. 27

Lewis v. Gatty, 268 v. Mmray, 235 Lloyd, ex parte, 61 Lock v. The Steam Navigation Company, 292 Lord v. Hall, 256 Lncas v. Risley, Luck v, Handley, 319 MANDEBS r. WILLIAMS, 228 Mandy v. Parker, 270 Mann o. Allen, 64 Marchant v. Jones, 118 Marklore v. Russell, 266 Marshall v. Jay

COUNTY COURTS CASES REPORTED IN THIS VOLUME, EXCLUSIVE OF INSOLVENCY. charges: Held, that the corporation was not liable. Norman v. Corporation of London, 2s\. Sheriffs’Court. onsideration. —The court will not look at the smallness of the consideration in an agreement. If, upon

Can a debt, barred by final order under 5 & 6 Viet, be revived by a promise to pay? Semble, it may. Whiffen and Others v. Munn, 184. Bromley. A party paying a portion of debt which is not legally compelled to pay, does not thereby render himself liable to pay the remainder, Good

Excessive.—A lodger, whose goods arc taken under a distraint for rent, may maintain an action for an excessive distress, and the remedy given by the statute of Marlebrege is not confined to the tenant. Davy v. Budkin, 199. Ex. Article of trade, Costs. —A cab, let for hire by the

and that upon that occasion he had received from him a map of the property, which map he produced It was objected that the map and the statement connected with it were inadmissible on the ground of privilege : Held, that the evidence was admissible; the communication having been

Sheriff —Writ of execution—When wholly executed—Several levies under the same writ, —lf writ of execution remains in the sherifTs hands, he is at liberty to make any number of distinct levies until the whole of the judgment-debt is satisfied, although several years may elapse be