PARLJAM RXTARY SUMMA R V c Lords', Wednesday night, the third Report the Committee on Prison Discipline, was presented fie Duke Richmond. The same Noble. Duke aye notice that should to-morrow move for the second ofthe Loan Societies Bill. Several Bills were brought from the Comm

petition from the proprietor* of the Thamee Tunnel, praying for aid to enable them to complete that work. The petitioner* *aid they had alreadr expended 170,MW. in proaecutinir it. and had turmountea difficulties which were never contemplated. They had already shown the practica

fl> have received letter-UiU week, but of fh«n nr,* t.»» lone fir Ir.'crtlon: mhers the wrfive n>4 luivinc bw*n jwld. nu de•lu.>ed. Th * .|midl*.n-.ni r .'i-tmlon an v.t ,, n* will Ik* f*.:ind anaarrud an*li*r ..or uioul «d ..f the * Pr.!i»l» fa»w>er.* ] addroiodait thl- paper,

This was an action for breach of promise of marriage brought Maria Holmes, an infant, by her next friend, against John Kusscll, butcher in New port-market. The defendant pleaded that made no such promise. Mr. Erie stated the case. The plaintiff, who was onlv 19, had been brought

ALLINGHAM'S ROTTERDAM CORN and BUNION HOLVKNT, wliich gives relief upon the first amilication. This valiuible preparation, which has stood the tost e>r|ieHcncc for the lust fourteen years in totally eradicating and Bunions, without ualn or Inconvenience, little recommendation of

OF SEH'EHS OFF It F. The Court was 'penally summoned on to tale into several motion>. The tirst was by Mr. Godrieh, the effect that .1 committee be appointed to each di frict, and that the surveyor !>e directed, all particubr occasions, give notice to the committee of the distric

COURT OF CHANCERY, LINCOLH'S-INN. Before the Lords Commissioners. In re Barrington, bankrupt petition per order ; in re Domgate. lu- natic petition ; in re Abdy, ditto ; Slade v. Patteson, appeal, part heard ; Bower v. Morris, appeal ; Ditto r. Clarke, per order ; Stocken v. Sto